Advertisement

It Is Still Though Being A Woman And Person Of Color – Power, Money And Greed.

It Is Still Though Being A Woman And Person Of Color – Power, Money And Greed.
Empowering Diverse Voices: Unlocking the Potential of Women, Immigrants, and MinoritiesIn the ever-evolving landscape of 2024, the challenges faced by women, immigrants, and marginalized groups continue to persist, despite the strides made towards gender and racial equality over the past decade. The resurgence of anti-feminist and xenophobic rhetoric in global politics poses a significant threat to the rights of these individuals, underscoring the urgent need to scrutinize current societal structures and act against exclusionary political philosophies to further advance human rights.

Overcoming Systemic Barriers: The Untapped Potential of Diverse Founders

Shattering the Glass Ceiling and the Glass Cliff

The concept of the glass ceiling encapsulates the pervasive yet often imperceptible barriers that obstruct women and marginalized groups from ascending to top-tier managerial and executive positions within organizations. These obstacles stem from entrenched biases within corporate cultures and practices, leading to fewer opportunities for mentorship, sponsorship, and career advancement compared to their male counterparts. This lack of support translates into tangible disadvantages, such as fewer promotions, smaller salary increases, and a diminished sense of belonging within the organization.The glass cliff phenomenon further exacerbates this challenge, where women are often appointed to leadership roles during times of organizational crisis. Paradoxically, when male leaders have led organizations into turmoil, the choice of a female successor becomes more acceptable. This pattern suggests a complex interplay of gender dynamics and perceptions of leadership suitability under stress, particularly in organizations with limited or no history of female leadership.

Leveling the Playing Field in Sports

Sports, often heralded as a universal equalizer, reveals a playing field far from level, particularly for women and immigrants. Immigrants contribute significantly to sports teams, often providing a competitive edge, yet they are often required to "prove" their contributions. In football, over half of the UK's national football squad in 2020 had familial ties abroad, and in the current 2024 UK national team, more than 50% of the squad have at least one parent or grandparent born outside the UK. In the 2018 World Cup-winning French team, 87% of the players were immigrants or children of immigrants, and some of the best players in the Netherlands team have a Suriname heritage. In the US, in 2020, foreign-born athletes made up 23% of the NBA and 29% of the MLB.However, the acclaim for immigrant athletes appears to be conditional, as they face scrutiny and systemic biases, highlighted starkly when their teams falter. Following England's defeat in the 2020 Euros against Italy, minority players like Rashford, Sancho, and Saka endured targeted racial abuse on social media after missing their penalties, despite their persistent contributions throughout the tournament. Similarly, Vinicius Jr has suffered horrible racial abuse in Spain, leading to a historic criminal conviction in June this year.Female athletes encounter similar biases, with lower pay, less media coverage, and fewer sponsorship opportunities compared to their male counterparts, despite their many recent, significant achievements. The US women's national soccer team (USWNT) have won 4 World Cup titles and consistently outperform the US men's team, yet prior to a historic settlement in 2022, female players earned 38% of what the men earned per game on average. Moreover, despite increased interest in watching women's sports, these sports are still only designated circa 15% of total sports media coverage.

Navigating Intersectional Challenges: Women and Immigrants in Conflict Zones

The impact of war and conflict disproportionately affects women and children, who make up the majority of civilian casualties. The United Nations estimates that close to 90% of war casualties today are civilians, and the European Institute of Gender Equality states that women in war-torn territories face physical, sexual, and psychological violence perpetrated by both state and non-state actors. Within the context of refugee camps, women still face multiple gender-based risks, from sexual exploitation to human trafficking, despite international legislation aimed at protecting them.The breakdown of traditional support systems and the normalization of violence against women in these conflict zones exacerbate the challenges faced by marginalized individuals. Women and immigrants in these environments lack adequate access to justice, legal remedies, and reparations, further compounding their vulnerability.

Microaggressions: The Subtle Barriers to Inclusion

Women and immigrants often encounter microaggressions, subtle and often unconscious or unintentional expressions of prejudiced attitudes, in both professional and social settings. These actions, while seemingly minor, accumulate over time and serve as constant reminders of the victims' perceived "otherness" and inferior status in society.Within the workplace, microaggressions can include comments on emotional state or appearance, being mistaken for someone more junior, and having their abilities questioned. Minoritized women face these microaggressions at a higher frequency, with additional challenges such as being confused with someone else from the same background. Consequently, women are 3 times more likely to think about quitting their jobs and 4 times more likely to almost always be burned out.In society at large, microaggressions can take the form of expecting women to be "attractive" or "likable," mansplaining, and talking down to or interrupting women while they are speaking. For immigrants, microaggressions can include assuming they are foreign-born, questioning their language skills, and perpetuating cultural stereotypes. These microaggressions contribute to creating an unwelcoming atmosphere, negatively impacting the mental health and well-being of the victims.

Investing in Diverse Founders: A Strategic Imperative

Despite the myriad obstacles they face, women, immigrants, and minoritized individuals have achieved remarkable success, often without any safety net. Their resilience and determination in surmounting systemic barriers underscore their hunger for success and indomitable will. Furthermore, these groups frequently outperform their counterparts, demonstrating exceptional ability and challenging the status quo.Their achievements highlight the urgency of addressing systemic biases and barriers. Investing in and supporting diverse founders is not merely a moral imperative but a strategic decision yielding substantial societal dividends. Forbes reports that nearly 70% of US and UK unicorns are founded by "underdog founders" (immigrants, women, people of color), who tend to have a growth mindset, strong work ethic, and ambition. Boston Consulting Group found that companies with diverse management teams have 19% higher innovation revenue, and McKinsey discovered 30% higher investor returns upon exit from diverse (gender and ethnic) founding teams.However, despite these successes, only 21% of immigrant and female founders receive funding from top VC firms, reflecting the unconscious biases prevalent in VC decision-making. Prioritizing investment in marginalized founders who face systemic barriers and inadequate funding not only promotes equity but also unlocks untapped potential and fosters ground-breaking solutions with broad societal benefits.Investing in diverse founders unleashes latent potential, paving the way for a more equitable world and enabling women, immigrants, and minoritized individuals to thrive and contribute meaningfully to society. This approach enhances lives, strengthens communities and economies globally, and drives positive change for generations to come, not to mention yields huge profits too.

Advertisement